首页> 外文OA文献 >Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool
【2h】

Developmental screening in South Africa : comparing the national developmental checklist to a standardized tool

机译:南非的发展筛查:将国家发展清单与标准化工具进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND : Worldwide, more than 200 million children in low- and middle-income countries have developmental delaysand/or disabilities. In South Africa the only nationally implemented developmental ‘screening’ tool is integrated as part of‘The Road to Health Booklet (RTHB).METHOD : The study employed a comparative cross- sectional within-subject design to evaluate the accuracy of the RTHB developmentalchecklist against a standardized international tool i.e. the PEDS tools, consisting of the PEDS and PEDS:DM.A total of 201 participants were included through convenience sampling at primary health care facilities in Tshwane, SouthAfrica.RESULTS : Sensitivity of the RTHB developmental checklist is low, but specificity is high. The RTHB developmental checklistfailed to identify more than half the infants at risk of delays or disorders. The nationally implemented developmental checklistis ineffective to identify at-risk infants. It should be adapted and validated or replaced in order to improve identificationof at-risk infants.
机译:背景:在全球范围内,低收入和中等收入国家的2亿多儿童患有发育迟缓和/或残疾。在南非,唯一的国家实施的发展性“筛查”工具被整合为“健康之路”(RTHB)的一部分。方法:该研究采用比较横断面受试者内部设计来评估RTHB发育性检查表相对于一个标准化的国际工具,即由PEDS和PEDS:DM组成的PEDS工具。通过便利采样在南非Tshwane的初级卫生保健机构中总共包括201名参与者。结果:RTHB发育检查表的敏感性较低,但特异性高。 RTHB发育检查表未能识别出超过一半的婴儿有延迟或疾病的风险。国家实施的发展检查清单无法有效识别高危婴儿。应该对其进行修改,验证或替换,以改善对高危婴儿的识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号